Wednesday, March 6, 2019

David Brooks -One Nation Slight Divisible Essay

Brooks discussed the differences between the twain groups. He described how Red the States was made up of farmers and rural communities, go Blue America consisted of medium-large cities with many stores and businesses. As Brooks looked at the florid and blue sections of the electoral map, he was interested in the concludes fag the voting patterns. He chose two cities to represent these two sections Franklin County in pop for Red America, and Montgomery County in Maryland for Blue America. He lived in Montgomery county and spent time talking with diametrical quite a little in Franklin county. Brooks began to look deeper at the reasons for the differences between the two groups and wondered if America was really a united nation anyto a greater extent.The first reason that Brooke considered was economics. He examined his theory that the rich and the poor have separated. The blue states had high incomes, higher determination stores, and jobs. Brooks asked people if they agreed that gold was what had split the U.S. Although most people greed with that statement, most did not consider themselves the people with less, and it was the ones with less that seemed more content with what they had. As he spent more and more time with the people, he found that it was really not money that split the nation. .The next idea he had was religion. He found that the office of people involved in religion was higher in red states. There were more churches in Franklin, and more people attended a weekly religious service. Even with these statistics, Brooks again found it was not religion. He found there were still bad people and problems in both cities. Yes there were differences, simply the differences didnt seem to be plenty to divide the nation.The final hypothesis Brooks dove into was self. Brooks proverb that in Red America there was less striving to be unique and impress others. Humility was much more prevalent in the red states, while people in the blue states te nded to place a larger focus on self. Brookes decided that this was a big difference, but not big enough to be the reason for division. aft(prenominal) looking at all these thoughts, Brooks concluded that the U.S. is not divided, but instead it is a Cafeteria Nation. Brooks said that everyone has their own group to fall down out with, just like what you would find in a instill cafeteria. There may be differences between people, but in the end they all come together as a nation to assistance each other in times of trouble. Brooks used the sheath of 9/11, to demonstrate this principle and then concluded that our nation was not and is not divided after all.

No comments:

Post a Comment